Daniel Lemire's blog
The ivory tower’s drift: how academia’s preference for theory over empiricism fuels scientific stagnation
Almost all of academic science has moved away from actual (empirical) science. It is higher status to work on theories and models. I believe that it is closely related to well documented scientific stagnation as theory is often ultimately sterile.
This tendency is quite natural in academia if there is no outside pressure… And is the main reason why academia should be ruthlessly judged by practitioners and users. As soon as academia can isolate itself in a bubble, it is bound to degrade.
It is worth trying to understand some of the factors driving this degradation… Theoretical work can sometimes be seen as more complex. This complexity can be mistakenly equated with higher intelligence or prestige. Empirical work, while also complex, often deals with tangible, observable data, which might seem more straightforward to the uninitiated.
Empirical work is more likely to lead to nuanced or inconclusive results while theory is often seemingly more direct and definitive. Theoretical research often requires fewer resources than large-scale empirical studies which might need extensive funding for equipment, data collection, and personnel. Thus you get to do more research with less using models and theory.
Theoretical work is often seen as requiring a high level of creativity to devise new frameworks or models. While empirical work also requires creativity in design, execution, and interpretation, the creativity in data collection or experimental design might be less recognized or appreciated.
The educational system often glorifies theoretical knowledge over practical skills until one reaches higher education or specialized training. E.g., we eagerly make calculus compulsory even if it has modest relevance in most practical fields. This educational bias can carry over into professional work.
Society must demand actual results. We must reject work that is said ‘to improve our understanding’ or ‘to lay a foundation for further work’. We must demand cheaper rockets, cures for cancer, software that is efficient. As long as academic researchers are left to their own devices, they will continue to fill the minds of the young with unnecessary models. They must be held accountable.
source
The ivory tower’s drift: how academia’s preference for theory over empiricism fuels scientific stagnation
Almost all of academic science has moved away from actual (empirical) science. It is higher status to work on theories and models. I believe that it is closely related to well documented scientific stagnation as theory is often ultimately sterile.
This tendency is quite natural in academia if there is no outside pressure… And is the main reason why academia should be ruthlessly judged by practitioners and users. As soon as academia can isolate itself in a bubble, it is bound to degrade.
It is worth trying to understand some of the factors driving this degradation… Theoretical work can sometimes be seen as more complex. This complexity can be mistakenly equated with higher intelligence or prestige. Empirical work, while also complex, often deals with tangible, observable data, which might seem more straightforward to the uninitiated.
Empirical work is more likely to lead to nuanced or inconclusive results while theory is often seemingly more direct and definitive. Theoretical research often requires fewer resources than large-scale empirical studies which might need extensive funding for equipment, data collection, and personnel. Thus you get to do more research with less using models and theory.
Theoretical work is often seen as requiring a high level of creativity to devise new frameworks or models. While empirical work also requires creativity in design, execution, and interpretation, the creativity in data collection or experimental design might be less recognized or appreciated.
The educational system often glorifies theoretical knowledge over practical skills until one reaches higher education or specialized training. E.g., we eagerly make calculus compulsory even if it has modest relevance in most practical fields. This educational bias can carry over into professional work.
Society must demand actual results. We must reject work that is said ‘to improve our understanding’ or ‘to lay a foundation for further work’. We must demand cheaper rockets, cures for cancer, software that is efficient. As long as academic researchers are left to their own devices, they will continue to fill the minds of the young with unnecessary models. They must be held accountable.
source
